Exploring our Catholic relationship with God

CCTD009 What, Me?! (Part 1)

Posted in Catechumenate by Dane on the December 22nd, 2009
 
icon for podpress  What, Me?! The Blessed Virgin Mary (Part 1 - Enhanced) [27:01m]: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

 
icon for podpress  What, Me?! (Enhanced): Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Join us in our discussion about the Blessed Virgin Mary as we acknowledge her role in salvation.  St. Augustine asserts that while Eve is the called the mother of the human race, Mary is called “Mother of salvation.” St. Jerome claims, “death through Eve, life through Mary.” These ideas illustrate the importance of Mary’s role in Christ’s redemption.  In this the first of two discussions about Mary, we explore the “Immaculate Conception” of Mary and how she is the Church’s model of faith.At the start of this discussion, it must be clear that what the Catholic faith believes about Mary is based on what it believes about Christ, and what it teaches about Mary illuminates in turn its faith in Christ. Doctrines concerning Mary are part of the Word of God that consists of both Scripture and Tradition.  Like Mary, the Church is the faithful handmaid of God’s Word. There are five key doctrines, rooted explicitly or implicitly in the Bible, that reveal the truth of who Mary is.The Catholic Church does not teach that Mary is divine. She is no goddess but a creature like us. She is absolutely unique and special because she is the woman out of all of history who was chosen by God the Father to give human flesh and blood to his divine Son. This act of God “the Incarnation”, is often misunderstood as the “Immaculate Conception.”The “Immaculate Conception” does not refer to the conception of Jesus in Mary’s womb. Rather, it refers to the conception of Mary in her mother’s womb. This truth has been taught and believed since at least the third century. Through the centuries the Church has become ever more aware that Mary, “full of grace” through God (cf. Genesis 3:15Open Link in New Window and Luke 1:28Open Link in New Window), was redeemed from the moment of her conception. This “dogma” was proclaimed by Pope Pius IX in 1854: “The most Blessed Virgin Mary was, from the first moment of her conception, by a singular grace and privilege of almighty God and by virtue of the merits of Jesus Christ, Savior of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of original sin. “Since she was to be the mother of the Redeemer” the one free from all sin so that he could be the perfect expiation of sin, it was necessary for her to be free from sin. Thus, God preserved Mary from original sin at the first moment of her conception.This first part of the discussion on Mary, shows how when we talk about Mary we ALWAYS do so in relationship to Jesus Christ. We do not worship her. God alone is adored and worshiped. Our devotion to Mary is meant always and only to lead us to deeper devotion to Christ, her son. We believe Mary was chosen by God for this and is thus a new mother for a new people, the People of God in Christ. As such she is he exemplary realization of the Church.More on Mary from the the Cathecism

57 Responses to 'CCTD009 What, Me?! (Part 1)'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'CCTD009 What, Me?! (Part 1)'.

  1. Mike said,

    on December 18th, 2006 at 12:34 pm

    Thanks again for the great class. Keep them coming.

  2. Bobby said,

    on August 22nd, 2014 at 11:16 am

    gotten@thermostat.inquisition” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ?????????????!!…

  3. ricky said,

    on August 22nd, 2014 at 5:38 pm

    fluidity@picnicked.hurt” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???….

  4. Lloyd said,

    on August 23rd, 2014 at 3:17 am

    hone@sewer.rusks” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???….

  5. mario said,

    on August 23rd, 2014 at 5:42 pm

    rey@jeroboams.caliphs” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ???????….

  6. Roberto said,

    on August 23rd, 2014 at 5:58 pm

    invitations@roving.preponderating” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  7. Marion said,

    on August 24th, 2014 at 1:23 am

    prosodic@takings.tornadoes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  8. Randall said,

    on August 24th, 2014 at 1:30 am

    calculators@navel.shakespeare” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ?????????????….

  9. frederick said,

    on August 24th, 2014 at 1:36 am

    decrement@vocalist.irishmen” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ??????? ?? ????!…

  10. angel said,

    on August 26th, 2014 at 12:34 pm

    signalizes@libertarians.filmdom” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ??????????….

  11. Tony said,

    on November 16th, 2014 at 4:12 pm

    tidbits@indolence.climbing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!!…

  12. harvey said,

    on November 18th, 2014 at 3:26 pm

    side@ingratitoode.scenarios” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  13. rodney said,

    on November 18th, 2014 at 5:54 pm

    stimulatory@ringing.custer” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  14. manuel said,

    on November 19th, 2014 at 3:41 pm

    calloused@salve.fireside” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  15. Lynn said,

    on November 19th, 2014 at 8:00 pm

    bedazzled@drugged.solemn” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  16. alberto said,

    on November 20th, 2014 at 8:45 am

    bruises@voraciously.rope” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  17. ricardo said,

    on November 20th, 2014 at 6:37 pm

    olivette@obtainable.commentator” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  18. Gilbert said,

    on November 21st, 2014 at 2:14 pm

    gyp@faultless.clairvoyance” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  19. Darren said,

    on November 22nd, 2014 at 3:58 am

    overpriced@stock.bronchiole” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  20. Lyle said,

    on November 22nd, 2014 at 7:58 am

    camouflage@chatter.aye” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  21. Paul said,

    on November 22nd, 2014 at 8:30 am

    bucky@owes.besieging” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!…

  22. julian said,

    on November 22nd, 2014 at 9:19 am

    insolent@drives.attend” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  23. Trevor said,

    on November 22nd, 2014 at 4:56 pm

    sibley@dehumanised.atoms” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  24. Ian said,

    on November 23rd, 2014 at 12:51 am

    earthy@imposition.hartsfield” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  25. ernesto said,

    on November 23rd, 2014 at 4:17 pm

    knuckle@relentlessness.hang” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  26. Jack said,

    on November 24th, 2014 at 9:28 am

    intensifier@pinned.benzell” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!!…

  27. jackie said,

    on November 24th, 2014 at 5:55 pm

    leningrads@greate.herold” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  28. Jackie said,

    on November 25th, 2014 at 6:44 am

    announce@horrifying.merest” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  29. Elmer said,

    on November 25th, 2014 at 3:00 pm

    beech@extenuating.revellings” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  30. Marion said,

    on November 26th, 2014 at 12:45 am

    unwelcome@band.speculative” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  31. vernon said,

    on November 27th, 2014 at 7:52 pm

    fanciful@mechanistic.faked” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!…

  32. jonathan said,

    on November 28th, 2014 at 12:02 am

    anton@review.sforzando” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!!…

  33. gene said,

    on November 29th, 2014 at 7:22 am

    ghostlike@chunks.pegler” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….

  34. ron said,

    on November 30th, 2014 at 11:18 am

    sharks@offsaddled.rumford” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  35. Carlton said,

    on December 1st, 2014 at 1:45 am

    maybe@cockroaches.verloop” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…

  36. Jeff said,

    on December 1st, 2014 at 12:12 pm

    tropocollagen@ransy.maternal” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  37. don said,

    on December 1st, 2014 at 2:31 pm

    stings@punishment.robed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!…

  38. Shannon said,

    on December 4th, 2014 at 2:17 pm

    whigs@cusp.mustache” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  39. claude said,

    on December 4th, 2014 at 6:40 pm

    latent@reprinted.rodent” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  40. Ramon said,

    on December 5th, 2014 at 7:34 pm

    marveled@thickest.carolinas” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!…

  41. shaun said,

    on December 6th, 2014 at 3:32 pm

    arapacis@infrequently.doormen” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  42. clinton said,

    on December 8th, 2014 at 1:15 pm

    choral@projection.stubs” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  43. gregory said,

    on December 9th, 2014 at 8:16 am

    brings@napkin.gute” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  44. Lawrence said,

    on December 10th, 2014 at 9:37 pm

    commandant@wickets.conants” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  45. Jeremy said,

    on December 10th, 2014 at 10:08 pm

    lyophilized@waitresses.nationals” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good….

  46. manuel said,

    on December 11th, 2014 at 2:11 pm

    piquant@bikinis.label” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  47. Darrell said,

    on December 12th, 2014 at 1:45 pm

    vivacity@bumpin.listing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  48. Kenny said,

    on December 14th, 2014 at 5:47 am

    immaterial@roofs.floridas” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  49. Ian said,

    on December 15th, 2014 at 1:01 am

    shun@matching.colonnade” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  50. Ronald said,

    on December 15th, 2014 at 6:02 pm

    influential@improvements.illnesses” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  51. warren said,

    on December 16th, 2014 at 5:10 pm

    bertha@dynasties.gather” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!!…

  52. Claude said,

    on December 16th, 2014 at 11:47 pm

    punctually@powers.barest” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

  53. greg said,

    on December 17th, 2014 at 12:21 am

    duane@homemakers.splotches” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  54. Melvin said,

    on December 17th, 2014 at 2:22 pm

    umber@facetious.arnolds” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  55. ross said,

    on December 18th, 2014 at 2:31 am

    achaeans@germs.eben” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  56. Harry said,

    on December 18th, 2014 at 2:41 am

    romanza@pomham.resuspended” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  57. derrick said,

    on December 18th, 2014 at 6:47 pm

    wheelock@cartridges.circulate” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Original Green-Marinee Theme by Ian Main
Catholic Classes theme by iPassion
More blogs about Roman Catholic