<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCTD010 What, Me?! (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.catholicclasses.org/2009/12/29/what-me-the-blessed-virgin-marypart-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.catholicclasses.org/2009/12/29/what-me-the-blessed-virgin-marypart-2/</link>
	<description>Exploring our Catholic relationship with God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:01:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dane</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicclasses.org/2009/12/29/what-me-the-blessed-virgin-marypart-2/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Dane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicclasses.org/2007/12/08/what-me-the-blessed-virgin-marypart-2/#comment-78</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Roy,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are correct; we included Mary Mother of the Church as one of the dogmas.  I appreciate your research and I hope you will continue to point out any inaccuracies.  It is our strong desire to remain accurate to the teachings of the Church.

Also, sorry for the delay in approving your post.  I have been in India on business for the past two weeks.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roy,</p>
<p>You are correct; we included Mary Mother of the Church as one of the dogmas.  I appreciate your research and I hope you will continue to point out any inaccuracies.  It is our strong desire to remain accurate to the teachings of the Church.</p>
<p>Also, sorry for the delay in approving your post.  I have been in India on business for the past two weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: royornelas</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicclasses.org/2009/12/29/what-me-the-blessed-virgin-marypart-2/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>royornelas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicclasses.org/2007/12/08/what-me-the-blessed-virgin-marypart-2/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>There are only 4 Dogmas of the Faith not 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are only 4 Dogmas of the Faith not 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Ornelas</title>
		<link>http://www.catholicclasses.org/2009/12/29/what-me-the-blessed-virgin-marypart-2/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Ornelas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.catholicclasses.org/2007/12/08/what-me-the-blessed-virgin-marypart-2/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>We must note that there are only 4 officially defined Dogmas. 

1) Theotokos - &quot;God Bearer&quot; or &quot;Mother of God&quot; at the Council of Ephesus 431AD

2) Perpetual Virgin - &quot;Ante partum, in partum, post partum&quot; - Latern Council 649AD

3) Immaculate Conception - Papal Bull &quot;Ineffabilis Deus&quot;, issued by Pope Pius IX on December 8, 1854.

4) Assumption - &quot;Munificentissimus Deus&quot; issued by Pope Pius XII, 1950

Now there is a dispute as to whether Pope Paul VI made a dogmatic definition when he called Mary &quot;Mother of the Church&quot; in 1964 at the Second Vatican Council, but at this point, there has been no official proclamation from the Vatican on this point.

Also, is the present movement to call Mary Co-Redemptrix or Mediatrix of All Graces, but these too have not been dogmatically defined.

As such I would highly caution you to state that you will be discussing the &quot;5 Dogmas&quot; when the truth is that there are only &quot;4 Dogmas&quot; related to Mary.

Peace and may God Bless your work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We must note that there are only 4 officially defined Dogmas. </p>
<p>1) Theotokos &#8211; &#8220;God Bearer&#8221; or &#8220;Mother of God&#8221; at the Council of Ephesus 431AD</p>
<p>2) Perpetual Virgin &#8211; &#8220;Ante partum, in partum, post partum&#8221; &#8211; Latern Council 649AD</p>
<p>3) Immaculate Conception &#8211; Papal Bull &#8220;Ineffabilis Deus&#8221;, issued by Pope Pius IX on December 8, 1854.</p>
<p>4) Assumption &#8211; &#8220;Munificentissimus Deus&#8221; issued by Pope Pius XII, 1950</p>
<p>Now there is a dispute as to whether Pope Paul VI made a dogmatic definition when he called Mary &#8220;Mother of the Church&#8221; in 1964 at the Second Vatican Council, but at this point, there has been no official proclamation from the Vatican on this point.</p>
<p>Also, is the present movement to call Mary Co-Redemptrix or Mediatrix of All Graces, but these too have not been dogmatically defined.</p>
<p>As such I would highly caution you to state that you will be discussing the &#8220;5 Dogmas&#8221; when the truth is that there are only &#8220;4 Dogmas&#8221; related to Mary.</p>
<p>Peace and may God Bless your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
